From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,11414a19b0e4a97a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Warren Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Advice on selling Ada to a C shop Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87631dmdmz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <2bb211f057648e4d892829e5ee79e34c@mixmaster.it> Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g"; logging-data="7989"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191JiKMvqqc+gV8WZlzIM/DyjNwWdh9obE=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Face: &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j Cancel-Lock: sha1:2YSiPBnXEenh+WEN53Xh+bsw7U8= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11855 Date: 2010-06-21T14:40:58+00:00 List-Id: George Orwell expounded in news:2bb211f057648e4d892829e5ee79e34c@mixmaster.it: >> So, I think the proper approach is to debunk their irrational fears >> of Ada and expose the real cost of bugs in the C software, which they >> have been ignoring up to now. Show them that no, C is not "good >> enough". > > I'm going to continue to play the devil's advocate only because I was > recently involved in a debacle along these lines. > > Whatever they have is good enough. There are very few companies today, > even software companies, that have not decided bugs, even serious > bugs, are just a fact of life. They accept they're going to anger or > even lose some percent of customers, but this is factored in to their > financial plans. Quality no longer matters, what matters is how much > money we can soak you for this quarter and how long we can get away > with it. I think you are generally right, until you get to "Quality no longer matters". I think it usually _does_ matter, but as you say, they've come to accept bugs as "normal". A quality product is still the goal from semi-honest companies. Certainly from a competitive pov. > A lot of this has come from the poor quality of PC software (Windows) > .... All the big companies are moving to offshore Sad but seemingly true. Worse than that, the programmer is no longer "needed". Business is always saying "we can do that ourselves" after they do a few weeks of night school on VB and Access. Eventually, something big goes wrong, and it all gets swept under a carpet (perhaps after a dismissal somewhere). Warren