From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,12c54a0f5a27d882 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Charmed Snark Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Autoconf & gnat Help Needed Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The Snarky Insanitorium Message-ID: References: <871ve53e1h.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g"; logging-data="13878"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Mk7RgwIK/c8QXNVFUkfds5HmS7RAqFfM=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Face: &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j Cancel-Lock: sha1:V8kKiUX/9boSD9/RSNSBSxDj/U0= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11180 Date: 2010-04-26T15:06:55+00:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta expounded in news:871ve53e1h.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org: > Warren writes: >> Vadim Godunko expounded in news:d50d540f-8fdf-40ae-9301- >> 4958c6bdff4f@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com: >>> On Apr 21, 11:54pm, Warren wrote: >>>> Has anyone here had experience using GNAT with autoconf/automake? .. > On the contrary; in most of my Debian packages, I bypass the brittle > autocrap, evil recursive makefiles (that do not play well with the .. > I can do that because I do not care about portability to platforms other > than Debian But one platform vastly simplifies things ;-) >> This becomes especially crucial when you try to make the project build >> under HPUX, Solaris, AIX and OSX in addition to usual Linux/*BSD >> lineup. The environments are different enough to frustrate any simple >> minded configuration management system. > > That's correct but assumes you want to take the burden of doing all this > by yourself. But that is precisely what the autocrap is for. It does work, albeit a bit unweildy. I resisted it myself for years, but once you embrace the darkside, you do find that it can work, when sufficiently coaxed. Warren