From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charmed Snark <snark@cogeco.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Snarky Insanitorium
Message-ID: <Xns9D54A502599D2SnarkCharmedImSure@188.40.43.213>
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <lnaathetnk.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>
 <4bbb3f22$0$7660$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <Xns9D5280BE09C18WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <hpfsf8$495$1@news.lrz-muenchen.de>
 <3bf0eb74-306c-48c4-b5ab-858d88b4079d@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <Xns9D5480F31D8E9WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <4bbe21b1$0$6759$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Injection-Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g";
	logging-data="21776"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OaqiQ9q12p9MH1GSvLu87InT/dJJe4Eg="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: 
 &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ptP8AE9lQ2vPL8DD6V4Zi5f9BxA=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9941 comp.lang.fortran:22245
Date: 2010-04-08T20:13:16+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus expounded in news:4bbe21b1$0$6759$9b4e6d93
@newsspool3.arcor-online.net:

> On 4/8/10 6:40 PM, Warren wrote:
> 
>> Speaking of 2005, I wouldn't mind acquiring a book on
>> the essential elements of the 2005 features in Ada,
>> [...]
>>
>> There must be a digestable summary on the net somewhere.
>> Resources?
> 
> The Ada Rationale would be one such resource.
> http://www.adaic.org/standards/rationale05.html

Thanks. Someone else emailed me about that as well, 
and so I went back and took a more serious look at 
it (my lazy- my bad). There is indeed a good summary 
of the change there.

Some very happy changes in there!

Warren