From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered  "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 20:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <Xns9D52AA6DE79WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <lnaathetnk.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>
 <4bbb3f22$0$7660$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <Xns9D5280BE09C18WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <hpfsf8$495$1@news.lrz-muenchen.de>
Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 20:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g";
	logging-data="17917"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DeJ4piLrSlnkQiyAJ5NVzsYzvKDGjt6Y="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: 
 &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HFlpXxf2yzJFgyDSwaNheH8Fs0I=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10870 comp.lang.fortran:24513
Date: 2010-04-06T20:45:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Sebastian Hanigk expounded in news:hpfsf8$495$1@news.lrz-muenchen.de:

> Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Obviously Fortran persists because of existing code base and
>> those that only "know" that. But egads, the current rendition
>> of Fortran seem to have so many "bags on the side" and is
>> downright "butt ugly".  Why anyone would want to continue
>> to wallow in that swill, is beyond me. Ada as a language OTOH, 
>> is so nice and clean by comparison.
> 
> I won't even start with your puny attempts at a language crusade,
....
> Sebastian

Wooo-oooo, aren't we snubby today.

Warren