From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c469fdacc2f3302b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Dynamic Variant Record Creation
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <Xns9D3F5BB8D4DC4WarrensBlatherings@85.214.113.135>
References: <Xns9D3D861E55DA0WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <c3fa9a0f-99c7-4fff-9310-7e4d769065db@s25g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <hnp4r7$eqo$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <a4de16f2-1b14-4c9d-886a-2e61f6c01863@k6g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <hnrr6j$d7n$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.motzarella.org; posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g";
	logging-data="10221"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/26sJcO3vPv+/ycW2RSsz48yx3Wd/uwO8="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: 
 &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vhACJvr9iHplghBV4/9vN36EkCg=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10619
Date: 2010-03-18T13:00:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Randy Brukardt expounded in news:hnrr6j$d7n$1@munin.nbi.dk:

..
> If the idea offered much additional expressiveness, I wouldn't object,
> but it doesn't seem to have enough.
> 
> Steve Baird and I had worked out a partially constrained discriminant 
> constraint which would have provided a much better solution to this
> problem along with many others -- but Tucker Taft couldn't seem to
> wrap his mind around the idea (it seemed natural to me) and thus it
> got quickly killed. Thus I don't think there will be any relief.
> 
>                                            Randy.

As it turned out (in my case at least), the problem was more
of a design problem (see upstream post). Once I reworked the
design, the problem vanished. ;-)

Warren