From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec21c3c7cdc7ff3e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!spool-big1.readnews.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: private types
From: "Peter C. Chapin" <pchapin@sover.net>
References: <1142279908.327131.230200@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
 <hZrRf.3235$x94.1497@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa4k6axpj1y.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
 <f_qSf.8758$Jz4.2940@trnddc08> <wccwtetciq0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <cRHSf.1991$TK2.563@trnddc07> <wccveubap2q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <VlVSf.325$Vx4.143@trnddc06> <1259548.CMTukHGvVZ@linux1.krischik.com>
 <Xns978B646AFFD10pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137>
 <SteTf.48935$d5.205176@newsb.telia.net>
 <1172812.9zPbPKbdVq@linux1.krischik.com> <dvlu9d$mg6$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
 <Xns978C3CC16F9D7pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137>
Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software
Message-ID: <Xns978C406FBDD08pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: 20 Mar 2006 11:19:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 3ce8901d.news.sover.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=W`iB>VINole:c^JI=HH@8bK6_LM2JZB_cl[Q90dZPIEn:WUUlR<856oSj@b=JHjB@o>F5hfB6j7Hk
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sover.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3481
Date: 2006-03-20T11:19:55+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Peter C. Chapin" <pchapin@sover.net> wrote in 
news:Xns978C3CC16F9D7pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137:

> Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in
> news:dvlu9d$mg6$1@sunnews.cern.ch: 
> 
>> Note: the following is explicitly prohibited:

Let me apologize for my last posting... I had read the above as "the 
following is explicitly *permitted*". I need to read a little more 
carefully in the future!

Peter