From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec21c3c7cdc7ff3e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!spool-big1.readnews.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: private types From: "Peter C. Chapin" References: <1142279908.327131.230200@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1259548.CMTukHGvVZ@linux1.krischik.com> Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Date: 19 Mar 2006 14:52:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 7e3a4925.news.sover.net X-Trace: DXC=P[J2R9GHLkF0gYVRhloIOBK6_LM2JZB_C>QH Martin Krischik wrote in news:1259548.CMTukHGvVZ@linux1.krischik.com: > Of course programming C or C++ on such an OS could be quite > challenging (Write to (void*)0 and you mess up your Proccess > Information Descriptor). The C/C++ standard does not require NULL pointers to be represented by all zero bits either. The null pointer constant, (void*)0, might be translated into 0xFFFFFFFF or some other value. Peter