From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAD_ENC_HEADER,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b756d9a0afb052a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!spool-big1.readnews.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Quick question about Ada code formatting. From: "Peter C. Chapin" References: Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Date: 18 Feb 2006 21:16:12 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: a3ce79e3.news.sover.net X-Trace: DXC=?RR8n6A;8:=>0K6_LM2JZB_3Al4DLh5FdR?3?@`i3kGa5;VQjKKAJhW5:^dUBMQdn\f< X-Complaints-To: abuse@sover.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2964 Date: 2006-02-18T21:16:12+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote in news:m2vevcpzlq.fsf@grendel.local: > On my current project we decided to use the formatting provided by > GLIDE/GPS and to use the -gnaty switch to check it. You can give a > whole slew of options to -gnaty but it seems far easier to just accept > the defaults even if they aren't what you would be used to. Thanks for your comments and to all the others who have responded. Thanks also for drawing my attention to -gnaty. That seems handy. I'm sure there must be other style checkers out there too. Peter