From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf02c238a92156a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.multikabel.nl!news.tudelft.nl!tudelft.nl!surfnet.nl!news.utwente.nl!not-for-mail
From: Ching Bon Lam <hmm@hmm.hmmm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Windows Ada database support.
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:32:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Message-ID: <Xns95ABEFA329DCBhmmhmmhmmm@130.89.1.105>
References: <5e3e03a7.0411240431.7e037a4e@posting.google.com>
 <uhdnft7r1.fsf@obry.net> <41A4DE66.40500@mailinator.com>
 <1mmefmfb0ld12.1ahn4lp4c0nt1.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shoop.adsl.utwente.nl
X-Trace: netlx020.civ.utwente.nl 1101335537 21190 130.89.227.153 (24 Nov 2004
 22:32:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@utwente.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:32:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6437
Date: 2004-11-24T22:32:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in
news:1mmefmfb0ld12.1ahn4lp4c0nt1.dlg@40tude.net: 

> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:17:58 +0100, Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
> 
>> Pascal Obry wrote:
>>> mark_doherty@yahoo.co.uk (Mark Doherty) writes:
>>> 
>>>>What is the current best advice. GNADE / CLAW / GWINDOWS.Database
>>>>GNAVI, or something else?
>>> 
>>> I would go for GNADE. AFAIK this is the only one (on the list above,
>>> not counting "something else" of course :) to run on GNU/Linux and
>>> Windows. I have lot of good experiences with GNADE (using ODBC) on
>>> both GNU/Linux and Windows. 
>> 
>> And I'm using the GNADE PSQL binding and it's really easy.
> 
> GNADE ODBC bindings are easy. The problem is that ODBC itself ain't
> easy. But if you want portability across different databases there is
> little choice. The optimal choice could be GNADE ADBC, unfortunately,
> its development was stopped.
> 

In GNADE CVS there is also Sqlite3 bindings which i wrote (dir dbi/sqlite). 
It supports quite most of the functions of sqlite3 except for user 
functions which you can call in SQL. It's still not much tested, but it's 
stable as far as i know.

www.sqlite.org
gnade.sf.net

C.B. Lam