From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9dec3ff1604723d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bitmanipulation in Ada
From: Bernd.Specht@gmx.com (Bernd Specht)
References: <Xns9549E5E9CFFB1BerndSpechgmxcom@151.189.20.10>
 <87k6vwrwym.fsf@insalien.org>
 <Xns9549EB926B2CBBerndSpechgmxcom@151.189.20.10>
 <wSSUc.27249$9Y6.977@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <Xns954AC8912E35DBerndSpechgmxcom@151.189.20.10>
 <cg2qcj$de0$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <Xns954AD004C1C96BerndSpechgmxcom@151.189.20.10>
 <cg32ja$qru$1@titan.btinternet.com>
Organization: No company
Message-ID: <Xns954BEF26A5324BerndSpechgmxcom@151.189.20.10>
User-Agent: Xnews/4.05.03
Date: 20 Aug 2004 21:31:37 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 2004 23:31:37 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 57497977.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=MDfRYE03T?F]_BK@0oKR>D:ejgIfPPldDjW\KbG]kaMHlSE5DYV?adA:<31E>kg_aLWEh14DWb8DHENCeBoTQ_6DLNa;jR\VcEJ
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2902
Date: 2004-08-20T23:31:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> wrote in
news:cg32ja$qru$1@titan.btinternet.com: 

> Bernd Specht wrote:
> Well, this isn't a complete solution (I've got a 4-year old to put to
> bed right now...) but it could send you on an alternative course (if
> the algorithm you posted is doing what I think it is! ;-)

I think you're right.

> The idea behind your loop (I think) is to swap bits from either end
> from MSBit to LSBit with a prime number 'twist' in each step?

Yes, but thats not exactly my task. I do some kind of data scrambling for 
transmission over public network.

> You can
> do this using the above as the basis for that solution - all in
> 'Unsigned_32'. 

Yes, I think so. Thanks.