From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef3b280a3831a63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C omega From: James Rogers References: <2if4rkFm3j4bU1@uni-berlin.de> Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 12:32:48 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.73.181.64 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1086525168 12.73.181.64 (Sun, 06 Jun 2004 12:32:48 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 12:32:48 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1165 Date: 2004-06-06T12:32:48+00:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry wrote in news:uzn7hhvb6.fsf@obry.org: > > James Rogers writes: > >> is clearly an example of a read/write lock. > > In that case my first Ada example does exactly that, no ? > I do not want to translate word-for-word the C-omega example. Actually your first Ada example was better. It did not contain the pathological behavior of the C-omega example. Jim Rogers