From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a4656a5edc0dab4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: End of "discussion" (was Re: Ada used in General Aviation (GA) applications?) From: Bernd.Specht@gmx.com (Bernd Specht) References: <409F69CB.8020604@noplace.com> Organization: No company Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/4.05.03 Date: 13 May 2004 08:30:58 GMT NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 May 2004 10:30:58 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.226.158.73 X-Trace: DXC=a[D^Il:QR_R8f4>W>BJ_OP:ejgIfPPldTjW\KbG]kaMXGSi?jHD8GOPI>_mJh6C88W_N6h9X=N2cSk? "Richard Riehle" wrote in news:buEoc.18396 $V97.11476@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: > > I suppose this is my fault for not taking the time (I have so much > of it) to port Ada to these other platforms myself. Hey, wouldn't this be an good assignment for a student group? ;-) > Those of us who are Ada advocates have only ourselves to blame. There is a bigg problem: Most Ada-advocats are too conceived. Look at this thread, I said I would give Ada a chance if there were a version for our processors. What was the reply? "You are stupid if you don't switch over", "You don't do your job well if you work with C" ... (bla bla). This really doesn't help. Best is to leave this group and let Ada silent die.