From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a4656a5edc0dab4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Ada used in General Aviation (GA) applications? From: Bernd.Specht@gmx.com (Bernd Specht) References: Organization: No company Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/4.05.03 Date: 12 May 2004 17:58:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 May 2004 19:58:50 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.153.22.9 X-Trace: DXC=Ih0]VabhH_SJ<1FClJbQ`\Q5U85hF6f;TjW\KbG]kaMXAV6U:Z=fE=_CUNa\n;ZYiS1RO Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote in news:mailman.114.1084352783.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org: > > >| -----Message d'origine----- >| De: Bernd.Specht@gmx.com [mailto:Bernd.Specht@gmx.com] ... >| > Use an Ada-to-C compiler for 8051. >| >| Why not directly C? > Because it cost 60% less to developp and because the result will > contain 8 time less bugs with a comparable test effort. Studies showing > that are on the net. 60% less??? Throw away current develop-tools. Throwing away the staffs know how. Start from scratch. Write Ada to generate C, instead the employees writing C-code. 60% less??? Maybe over the next 100 years. But till then the company is dead. Our business is to make profit. You are an academician?