From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-13 05:36:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) From: James Rogers References: <88dc613b.0402121520.bf939f8@posting.google.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:36:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.73.180.63 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1076679407 12.73.180.63 (Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:36:47 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:36:47 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5527 Date: 2004-02-13T13:36:47+00:00 List-Id: Per Sandberg wrote in news:mailman.24.1076654262.295.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org: > You published the results but not the source code that has ben used. > One thing you must do in order to be belived is to publish the sourcs > becouse if you are doing the exacgtly same thing in Ada/C/C++ the > results shall be the about same. > > And the you are comparing GCC/VC what about compiler switches and > optimization? > > /Just normal asking > /Per > The language shootout does publish source code. It does not specify compiler switches, or optimization. The site also has a disclaimer about using its data as a basis for definitive comparisons between languages. Jim Rogers