From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d89b08801f2aacae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-01 12:11:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!easynews!news-xfer2.newshosting.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is strong typing worth the cost? From: Dan Andreatta References: <82347202.0205010735.1d1a66c3@posting.google.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.151.109 Date: 1 May 2002 13:12:16 -0700 X-Original-Trace: 1 May 2002 13:12:16 -0700, 129.252.151.109 X-COMPLAINTS: Report abuse to abuse@mhogaming.com Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 488f9d56.news.newshosting.com X-Trace: DXC=U7bYeMJT`689`^k1L3iF6BbIV4YY2mfkIQ\;j:O<9W7md2n@Qe dmjones wrote in news:Xns9201C885373ADderekknosofcouk@194.168.222.64: > Strong typing requires me to pay more attention to 100% of the > source I write. By pay attention I mean I have to get it through > the compiler (the compiler will pick me up on type errors that I will > have to invest time in fixing). Using a weakly typed language does > not require me to invest so much time up front. > To me, it seems the exact opposite. I can be a little sloppier, because I know that those errors will be caught by the compiler. Dan