From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-05 07:22:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!news-in-sanjose!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 10:21:43 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 14:21:43 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13787 Date: 2001-10-05T14:21:43+00:00 List-Id: In article , tmoran@acm.org says... > >>I think its dangerous to point to the LRM as the cannonical source of proper >>naming, ... > Pointing to "Ada 95 Quality and Style", online at >http://www.grammatech.com/style_guide/cover.html >might be a better idea. In which case, the appropriate link would be http://www.grammatech.com/style_guide/sec_3a.html#3.2.4 , although it talks about the naming of packages *and* their associated tagged types. If you are making a package without tagged types, there really isn't any help in there for you. (But _pkg is *still* out!) --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.