From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b59b337045eece60
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: anon@anon.org (anon)
Subject: Re: Structure of the multitasking server
Reply-To: no to spamers (No@email.given.org)
References: 
 <8b4d1170-22e6-40d3-8ed1-096dc0163491@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0
Message-ID: <XaWAk.44302$Mh5.8741@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:01:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.6.136
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1221865271 12.65.6.136 (Fri,
 19 Sep 2008 23:01:11 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:01:11 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2050
Date: 2008-09-19T23:01:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Since you are using Channels, I am assuming that your talking about TCP/IP 
servers. In this case you should look into using the Check_Selector with 
the use of Signalling_Fds and Socket_Sets instead of using arrays.

Now the way GNAT has written the Selector function and the way the C_Select
is written the maximum number of server per Check_Selector is 27.  That is, 
each C_Select function can only monitor 32 sockets, but 
GNAT.Sockets.Create_Selector uses two socket and the TCP/IP sub-system 
uses or predefines 3, so you are left with 27 user define servers.

Found this clent/server on the net.  The following client/server shows how to 
use the Check_Selector routine. They were both were written in all caps and 
use Ada-95 spec so,  you may need to adjust the Signalling_Fds routine 
calls for Ada-2005 (GNAT-2008), but they do compile and excute under 
GNAT GPL 2007 using Linux. 

Note: 1) I alter for spacing and cap format. To make them more readable.
      2) The procedure "Set_Socket_Option" may need to be commented 
          out.  Some TCP/IP system do not like GNAT version of that 
          routine.
      3) As for Windows, I did not test!


--------------------------------------------------------------
--
--  Pool_Server
--
with GNAT.Sockets ; 
use GNAT.Sockets ;
with Ada.Text_IO ;

procedure Pool_Server is

    MaxTasks : constant Positive := 5 ;  -- buffer size
    type Index is mod MaxTasks ;

    function Rev ( S : String ) return String is
        Res : String ( S'Range ) ;
        J : Integer := S'First ;
      begin
        for I in reverse S'Range loop
         Res ( J ) := S ( I ) ;
         J := J + 1 ;
        end loop ;
        return Res ;
      end Rev ;

    protected Aborted is
      procedure Set ;
      function Check return Boolean ;
    private
      Done : Boolean := False ;
    end Aborted ;

    protected body Aborted is
      procedure Set is
        begin
          Done := True ;
        end Set ;

      function Check return Boolean is
        begin
          return Done ;
        end Check ;
    end Aborted ;


   type Echo ;
   type Echo_Access is access Echo ;

    task type Echo is
      entry Start ( N_Sock : IN Socket_Type ;
                    Self : IN Echo_Access   ) ;
      entry ReStart ( N_Sock : IN Socket_Type ) ;
    end Echo ;

    type Task_Array is array ( Index ) of Echo_Access ;

    protected Buffer is
      entry Deposit ( X : in Echo_Access ) ;
      entry Extract ( X : out Echo_Access ) ;
      function NumWaiting return Natural ;
    private
      Buf : Task_Array ;
      I, J : Index := 0 ;
      Count : Natural range 0 .. MaxTasks := 0 ;
    end Buffer ;


    task body Echo is
        Sock : Socket_Type ;
        S : Stream_Access ;
        Me : Echo_Access ;
        Input_Selector : Selector_Type ;
        Input_Set : Socket_Set_Type ;
        WSet : Socket_Set_Type ;
        Input_Status : Selector_Status ;
      begin
      --set up selector
      Create_Selector ( Input_Selector ) ;

      --Initialise socket sets
      --WSet is always empty as we are not interested in output events
      -- RSet only ever contains one socket namely Sock
      Empty ( Input_Set ) ;
      Empty ( WSet ) ;

      ACCEPT Start ( N_Sock : IN Socket_Type ;
                     Self : IN Echo_Access   ) DO
        Sock := N_Sock ;
        Me := Self ;
      end Start ;

      loop
        begin   -- block for exception handling
          S := Stream ( Sock ) ;    -- set up stream on socket
          Boolean'Write ( S, True ) ;  -- acknowledge connection

          loop
            -- check for input on Sock socket
            Set ( Input_Set, Sock ) ;

            -- time-out on check if no input within 0.5 second
            Check_Selector ( Input_Selector,
                             Input_Set,
                             WSet,
                             Input_Status,
                             0.5 ) ;
            if Input_Status = Completed then
              -- we have input, so process it
              declare
                  Str : String := String'Input ( S ) ;
              begin
                exit when Str = "quit" ;
                String'Output ( S, Rev ( Str ) ) ;
              end ;
            end if ;
            if Aborted.Check then
              String'Output ( S, "Server aborted" ) ;
              exit ;
            end if ;
          end loop ;

          Ada.Text_IO.New_Line ;
          Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "Slave Closing Connection" ) ;
          ShutDown_Socket ( Sock, Shut_Read_Write ) ;
          Buffer.Deposit ( Me ) ;

          exception
            -- The mostly likely exception is if client quits unexpectedly
            -- close the socket and deposit ourselves in the buffer
          when others =>
               Ada.Text_IO.New_Line ;
               Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "Connection closed unexpectedly" ) ;
               Close_Socket ( Sock ) ;
               Buffer.Deposit ( Me ) ;
        end ;

        select
          ACCEPT ReStart ( N_Sock : IN Socket_Type ) DO
            Sock := N_Sock ;
          end ReStart ;
        or
          -- terminate if all slaves are queued here and
          -- if the main server task has finished
          terminate ;
        end select ;

      end loop ;
    end Echo ;

    protected body Buffer is
      entry Deposit ( X : IN Echo_Access ) when Count < MaxTasks is
        begin
          Buf ( I ) := X ;
          I := I + 1 ;
          Count := Count + 1 ;
        end Deposit ;

      entry Extract ( X : OUT Echo_Access ) when Count > 0 is
        begin
          X := Buf ( J ) ;
          J := J + 1 ;
          Count := Count - 1 ;
        end Extract ;

      function NumWaiting return Natural is
      begin
         return Count ;
      end NumWaiting ;
   end Buffer ;

    Server          : Socket_Type ;
    New_Sock        : Socket_Type ;
    Slave           : Echo_Access ;
    Addr            : Sock_Addr_Type ( Family_Inet ) ;
    Peer_Addr       : Sock_Addr_Type ( Family_Inet ) ;
    Avail           : Boolean := False ;
    Ch              : Character ;
    TotalTasks      : Natural := 0 ;
    Accept_Selector : Selector_Type ;
    Accept_Set      : Socket_Set_Type ;
    WSet            : Socket_Set_Type ;
    Accept_Status   : Selector_Status ;

  begin  --  main server task
    Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "WARNING server loops for ever." ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put ( "Press A to terminate server and all " ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "tasks immediately or press Q to ") ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put ( "accept no further connections and " ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put ( "terminate gracefully when all clients " ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put ( "are fully when all clients are through." ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.New_Line ;
    Initialize ;
    Create_Socket ( Server) ;
    Addr := ( Family_Inet,
              Addresses ( Get_Host_By_Name ( Host_Name ), 1 ),
              50000 ) ;
    --  allow server address to be reused for multiple connections
    Set_Socket_Option ( Server, 
                        Socket_Level,
                        ( Reuse_Address, True ) ) ;

    Bind_Socket ( Server, Addr ) ;
    Listen_Socket ( Server, 4 ) ;

    --  set up selector
    Create_Selector ( Accept_Selector ) ;

    --  Initialise socket sets
    --  WSet is always empty as we are not interested in output 
    --  events Accept_Set only ever contains one socket namely 
    --  Server
    Empty ( Accept_Set ) ;
    Empty ( WSet ) ;
    loop
      Ada.Text_IO.Get_Immediate ( Ch, Avail ) ;
      if Avail and then
         ( Ch = 'q' or Ch = 'Q' or Ch = 'a' or Ch = 'A' ) then
        exit ;
      end if ;

      --  check for input (connection requests) on Server socket
      Set ( Accept_Set, Server ) ;
      --  time-out on check if no request within 1 second
      Check_Selector ( Accept_Selector, 
                       Accept_Set,
                       WSet, 
                       Accept_Status, 
                       1.0 ) ;

      if Accept_Status = Completed then
        --  must be an event on Server socket as it is the only 
        --  one that we are checking.
        --  Hence the Accept_Socket call should not block.

        Accept_Socket ( Server, New_Sock, Peer_Addr ) ;
        Ada.Text_IO.New_Line ;
        Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line 
                        ( "Connection accepted -- allocating slave" ) ;


      if Buffer.NumWaiting = 0  and TotalTasks < MaxTasks then
          Slave := NEW Echo ;              -- start new task
          TotalTasks := TotalTasks + 1 ;
          Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "New slave task started" ) ;
          --  call entry Start to activate task
          Slave.Start ( New_Sock, Slave ) ;
        else
          Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "Waiting for an idle slave task" ) ;
          Buffer.Extract ( Slave ) ;
          --  call entry Start to re-activate task
          Slave.ReStart ( New_Sock ) ;
          Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( " Idle slave task reactivated" ) ;
        end if ;
      end if ;
    end loop ;

    if Ch = 'a' or Ch = 'A' then
      --  signal slave tasks to terminate
      Aborted.Set ;
    end if ;

   --  tidy up
    Close_Selector ( Accept_Selector ) ;
    Empty ( Accept_Set ) ;

    Close_Socket ( Server ) ;
    Ada.Text_IO.New_Line ;
    Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "Main server task exiting ..." ) ;
    Finalize ;
end Pool_Server ;


--------------------------------------------------------------
--
--  Pool_Client
--
with Gnat.Sockets ;
use  Gnat.Sockets ;
with Ada.Command_Line ; 
use  Ada.Command_Line ;
with Ada.Text_IO ;
use  Ada.Text_IO ;

procedure Pool_Client is
    Sock : Socket_Type ;
    S : Stream_Access ;
    Addr : Sock_Addr_Type ( Family_Inet ) ;
    Msg : String ( 1 .. 80 ) ;
    Last : Natural ;
    B : Boolean ;
    Read_Selector : Selector_Type ;
    Read_Set, WSet : Socket_Set_Type ;
    Read_Status : Selector_Status ;
  begin
    Initialize ;
    Create_Socket ( Sock ) ;
    Addr := ( Family_Inet,
              Addresses ( Get_Host_By_Name ( Argument ( 1 ) ), 1 ),
              50000 ) ;
    Create_Selector ( Read_Selector ) ;
    Empty ( Read_Set ) ;
    Empty ( WSet ) ;


    Connect_Socket ( Sock, Addr ) ;
    S := Stream ( Sock ) ;
    Boolean'Read ( S, B ) ;
    -- wait for connection to be accepted

    loop
      Set ( Read_Set, Sock ) ;

      -- check for input on socket  (server may be aborting)
      -- time-out immediately if no input pending
      -- We seem to need a small delay here (using zero seems to block
      -- forever)
      -- Is this a GNAT bug or AB misreading Check_Selector docs?

      Check_Selector ( Read_Selector, 
                       Read_Set,
                       WSet, 
                       Read_Status,
                       0.005 ) ;
      if Read_Status = Expired then
        Ada.Text_IO.Put ( "Message> " ) ;  -- prompt user for message
        Ada.Text_IO.Get_Line ( Msg, Last ) ;

        -- send message to socket unless server is aborting
        String'Output ( S, Msg ( 1 .. Last ) ) ;
        exit when Msg ( 1 .. Last ) = "quit" ;
      end if ;

      declare 
          -- receive message
          Str : String := String'Input ( S ) ;
      begin      Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( Str ) ;
        exit when Str = "Server aborted" ;
      end ;
    end loop ;

    Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "Client quitting ..." ) ;
    ShutDown_Socket ( Sock ) ;
    Close_Selector ( Read_Selector ) ;
    Finalize ;
  exception 
    when others =>
        Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Exception: Client quitting ..." ) ;
        Close_Socket ( Sock ) ;
        Close_Selector( Read_Selector ) ;
        Finalize ;
  end Pool_Client ;


In <8b4d1170-22e6-40d3-8ed1-096dc0163491@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> writes:
>Hi all,
>
>Imagine a server with fixed number of worker tasks. There is no queue
>of jobs and jobs are immediately passed to one of the tasks that is
>currently idle. There is a separate task (or just the main one) that
>provides jobs for worker tasks.
>
>I am concerned with the proper structure of objects - I mean in the
>sense of recommended Ada practice.
>Obviously there is a need for some shared resource where the
>requesting task will put the job and from where the worker task will
>pick it up.
>
>This is more or less what I came up with, where the "channel" is a
>single processing pipeline:
>
>   type Worker_State is (Idle, Ready, Working);
>
>   protected type Channel_State is
>      procedure Post (J : in Job_Type);
>      entry Get_Job (J : out Job_Type);
>      function Busy return Boolean;
>   private
>      State : Worker_State := Idle;
>      Job_To_Do : Job_Type;
>   end Channel_State;
>
>   protected body Channel_State is
>
>      procedure Post (J : in Job_Type) is
>      begin
>         if State /= Idle then
>            raise Program_Error;
>         end if;
>
>         Job_To_Do := J;
>         State := Ready;
>      end Post;
>
>      entry Get_Job (J : out Job_Type) when State = Ready is
>      begin
>         J := Job_To_Do;
>         State := Working;
>      end Get_Job;
>
>      function Busy return Boolean is
>      begin
>         return State /= Idle;
>      end Busy;
>
>   end Channel_State;
>
>   type Channel;
>   task type Worker_Task (Ch : access Channel);
>
>   type Channel is record
>      State : Channel_State;
>      Worker : Worker_Task (Channel'Access);
>   end record;
>
>   task body Worker_Task is
>      Job : Job_Type;
>   begin
>      loop
>         Ch.all.Get_Job (Job);
>
>         --  do the job ...
>
>      end loop;
>   end Worker_Task;
>
>   Max_Channels : constant := 5;
>
>   Channels : array (1 .. Max_Channels) of Channel;
>
>My question is whether this is what a seasoned Ada programmer would
>do.
>Initially I tried to have two separate arrays, one for jobs and one
>for worker tasks, but I found it difficult to link workers with their
>respective jobs. After bundling them together in a single record that
>is referenced from the task it worked and I actually find it
>structured better.
>
>The main task after constructing a job object finds some channel where
>the worker task is not busy and posts the job to its shared state
>component:
>
>   loop
>      Job := ...
>
>      Found_Worker := False;
>      for I in Channels'Range loop
>         if not Channels (I).State.Busy then
>            Channels (I).State.Post (Job);
>            Found_Worker := True;
>            exit;
>         end if;
>      end loop;
>
>      if not Found_Worker then
>         --  all pipelines are busy,
>         --  but the overflow handling is not shown...
>      end if;
>   end loop;
>
>All this works fine, but my question considers the choice of language
>constructs and idioms.
>
>--
>Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
>
>Database Access Library for Ada: www.inspirel.com/soci-ada