From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6f7b92fd11ab291 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-17 12:40:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Crosspost: Help wanted from comp.compilers References: <20030717141153.0746785b.falis@verizon.net> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1058470839 12.234.13.56 (Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:40:39 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:40:39 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:40:40 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40430 Date: 2003-07-17T19:40:40+00:00 List-Id: > > Which is a bug in gnatmake, IMHO. > Use the -s switch to gnatmake if you want that behavior. Sorry. I should reread the Gnat User Guide more frequently. > How can it be considered a bug when it's not defined behavior in the Ada > standard, and it is in the gnat manuals? Does the ALRM say something about "make" type programs, or order of compilation? IMHO, it's a design bug that -s isn't the default for gnatmake, (and that -gnato isn't the default for something that calls itself "The GNU Ada 95 Compiler").