From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fcc2d88d867060e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-20 23:15:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!attbi_s51.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: load and use a ".o" file?
References: <k65Fb.1697$J06.785@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <XLbFb.8689$VB2.17113@attbi_s51>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.133.123
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s51 1071990903 24.6.133.123 (Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:15:03 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:15:03 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:15:03 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3656
Date: 2003-12-21T07:15:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > with remotely accessible procedures etc and use Annex E.
>
> That would be horribly inefficient.
  The question is, would it take too long.  If you are going to make
billions of these calls and subroutine call efficiency is a real problem,
perhaps you should write out an entire new program, including the
freshly generated code, and compile that with full global optimization,
subroutine inlining, etc.