From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: Lack of Mature Tools (was: Lockheed Martin, Green Hills, etc.) Date: 2000/04/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 616035863 References: <87wvll7a5h.fsf@think.mihalis.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 956778167 206.170.2.209 (Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:42:47 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:42:47 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >I'll bet you (i.e. ACT) can be pretty sure that those bits correspond >exactly to the ACT build of that public version just with a sum(1). >If you published checksums on ... Even if the bits on disk at NYU were guaranteed, ie, ACT agreed to pay money to anyone who downloaded them for free and then discovered they weren't correct, how many people have certified download and unpack (eg pkunzip) software?