From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 11:47:34 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsfeed!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!216.166.71.14!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:47:35 -0500
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:47:53 -0500
From: Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com>
 <VjOAa.16051$8g5.257873@news2.e.nsc.no> <3ED41344.7090105@spam.com>
 <3ED46D81.FF62C34F@0.0> <3ED46E07.4340CABC@0.0>
 <3ED4F3FD.A0EF7079@alfred-hilscher.de> <xIeBa.1017346$3D1.597085@sccrnsc01>
 <bebbba07.0305292326.75f5fbef@posting.google.com>
 <6vWcnTWjF83bD0qjXTWcpA@gbronline.com>
 <1054316494.552743@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
In-Reply-To: <1054316494.552743@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <WiidnRJGUbLVOkqjXTWcpw@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.76
X-Trace: 
 sv3-ZOFW77hkPZNVyDDEJYfMOqdWjEtg1QhBdnxtMeao6G3C+Lf2xs/ngFvwf5/fhxQ/iHQaHNDfVmFXkhW!7tMk6aw30z+DokSRlZs/iQVXdaJmji3MP5qIVvfEKmkqXTdBrfgsh/WoRITi99SaBitlKoIpwUy0!uycz
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38133
Date: 2003-05-30T13:47:53-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>> After all, they are the same, are they not?
> 
> They are not, in the case of user-defined overloads
> of the operators. Or at least they shouldn't be.

In that situation, the conclusion is the same--no problem.
The user can only define the operators in terms the compiler
already supports.  Therefore, the compiler must merely do
what the user defined.