From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a43471f113780a14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-08 17:20:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news100.world-online.no!news100.world-online.no!nntp.newmedia.no!news.powertech.no!newsfeed1.ulv.nextra.no!nextra.com!news2.ulv.nextra.no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Daniel Dudley" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.67.216.167 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@nextra.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 02:20:06 MEST X-Trace: news2.ulv.nextra.no 1023582006 130.67.216.167 Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 00:20:06 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25571 Date: 2002-06-09T00:20:06+00:00 List-Id: "Michael Bode" wrote in message news:m3u1odijig.fsf@jupiter.solar.system... > "Daniel Dudley" writes: > > > I'd be surprised if it isn't, Michael. My point is that I > > want to avoid having to write parameters on the command > > line or in batch/command files. An IDE provides an > > alternative way for the user to provide the necessary > > parameters, and then takes care of writing them to the > > command line. I guess I'm used to being pampered. ;-) > > Ok, but still it is pretty simple to type the command line > parameters for gnat. And because it is so simple pretty much > every programmer's editor should be able to handle it for you. > I'm using Emacs 21. It needs a bit of getting used to, but it > has among others the advantage that you can use it on Windows, > Linux and many other systems. Learn once, use everywhere. It > also has support for CVS (works on Windows too). And for Ada > of course. Yes, Aidan Skinner suggested Emacs too. I've tried it in connection with both Prolog and Mozart (and maybe others) but never felt comfortable with it. I guess some people are more resilient too antiquities than others. ;-) But maybe Emacs has got better lately, perhaps even got the "look and feel" of a Windows' program. Now _that_ would be the 8th wonder of the world! That we should get so lucky. :-) Daniel