From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52df33ed7828ab9a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-10 11:32:23 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Caffeine Junky <nospam@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada OS
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <fe4bb2c2.0208052200.77d14528@posting.google.com>
 <6dfa3582.0208100016.7a066555@posting.google.com>
User-Agent: Pan/0.11.3 (Unix)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Comment-To: "AFS97209" <afs97209@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <W_c59.55228$7n5.9499@sccrnsc01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.245.48.122
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1029004342 12.245.48.122 (Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:32:22 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:32:22 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:32:22 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27919
Date: 2002-08-10T18:32:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 04:16:48 -0400, AFS97209 wrote:

> What about using the current versions of L4 laying around as a starting
> point?
 
I was thinking the same thing.

I wouldn't be very difficult to get a small OS running on top of L4. Plus
L4 seems to be much more efficient than the Mach microkernel.

I'm gonna go read up on it some more.

St4pL3