From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d663b6230c9b3312 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AVR GCC/GNAT port quality ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1182873846 12.201.97.213 (Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:04:06 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:04:06 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:04:06 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16317 Date: 2007-06-26T16:04:06+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: > > I don't know about the AVR port in particular, but AdaCore in general > offers a very high quality product, both the compiler/runtime and the > support. I would assume the AVR port would be equally high quality. My understanding is that the GNAT AVR compiler is the best freely available Ada compiler for the AVR platform. -- Jeff Carter "Oh Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy." Monty Python and the Holy Grail 24