From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-20 08:42:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:41:58 -0600 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:41:57 -0500 From: "Robert I. Eachus" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why ada is so unpopular ? References: <49cbf610.0401170627.79c3dfe5@posting.google.com> <400A9B48.3060100@noplace.com> <400BD4B5.6000307@noplace.com> <_NedndNu6J_W_5Hd4p2dnA@comcast.com> <100p0avmc6r8146@corp.supernews.com> <38qdnRxA9pefI5Hd4p2dnA@comcast.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.34.214.193 X-Trace: sv3-aRMQ689o9GSey0Jc2A3nQJTfa/YIzcUHNUoQrY2qK3xSI5gJfpgqqXqEQEHojCujoVMIZ+f+kGVzy6Z!RvHfJGYDzArTGu2CNNnp8eb10VINORZ3MDFreGPlJwKMcqHyclCV1m0cQXsing== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4573 Date: 2004-01-20T11:41:57-05:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: > On 2004-01-20, Robert I. Eachus wrote: > >>Shrug. I would like it if GtkAda had a more Ada-like binding. But as I >>said it is more than good enough so other things are higher on my >>priority list. > > > Please descibe what you mean. Exactly what I said. There are some areas where, when I use GtkAda, I think "It might be nice if..." Then when I think about it a bit more, I realize what a major undertaking it would take compared to the very minor benefit, and forget about it. I'd mention specific cases, but as I said, I can't even think of any that were worth remembering. ;-) Just in case anyone thinks I am 'damning with faint praise', there is a very good reason that GtkAda is currently the most used Ada graphics interface, and that is that it is by far the best. There are lots of other things where an investment of my time may make a difference, excuse me if I get back to them. Incidently when Ada0Y is finalized and compilers comform to it, I suspect that changing GtkAda to use interfaces and constructors in some areas will be well worth the effort. But that is probably a project for next year, or the year after. -- Robert I. Eachus "The war on terror is a different kind of war, waged capture by capture, cell by cell, and victory by victory. Our security is assured by our perseverance and by our sure belief in the success of liberty." -- George W. Bush