From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ddc02527645a844
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-30 18:53:43 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!mtvwca1-snh1.ops.genuity.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "James S. Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
From: "James S. Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <Xns934E8C5D49EFBerndSpechtgmxcom@62.153.159.134>
 <6jIha.35142$ja4.2255611@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <MPG.18f18ac32e4a300d9896c8@News.CIS.DFN.DE>
Subject: Re: tasking with GNAT 3.14p on windows
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <W4Oha.35749$ja4.2291095@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 02:53:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.86.34.45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1049079222 12.86.34.45 (Mon,
 31 Mar 2003 02:53:42 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 02:53:42 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35814
Date: 2003-03-31T02:53:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jano" <nono@celes.unizar.es> wrote in message
news:MPG.18f18ac32e4a300d9896c8@News.CIS.DFN.DE...
> James S. Rogers dice...
> > "Bernd Specht" <Bernd.Specht@gmx.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns934E8C5D49EFBerndSpechtgmxcom@62.153.159.134...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried an example from "Barnes, 18.8", but it didn't work as
expected.
> > Any
> > > ideas?
> > >
> > > with Text_IO; use Text_IO;
> > >
> > > procedure TaskTest is
> > > begin
> > >   select
> > >     delay 3.0;
> > >     put_line ("aborted");
> > >   then abort
> > >     loop
> > >       null; -- modified
> > >     end loop;
> > >   end select;
> > > end TaskTest;
> > >
> (...)
> > The null command will reliably take less than 3.0 seconds to complete.
>
> It's inside of a neverending loop.

And optimization will remove the loop, leaving a single null statement.

Jim Rogers