From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,557136a92a6a20c7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: Do you do ASIS? Date: 2000/03/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 592867747 References: <89p2js$st2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 952124725 206.170.2.199 (Fri, 03 Mar 2000 15:05:25 PST) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 15:05:25 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-03-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Which vendor's compiler? That is ultimately the question. I don't understand. Shouldn't a program that makes ASIS calls to fetch information work identically regardless of whose compiler, or whose ASIS implementation, it is calling? (Not that there seem to be all that many choices...) Or are you talking about efficiency and ease of use?