From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,f7a7163813ae8672
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,f7a7163813ae8672
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7a7163813ae8672
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fa0ae,f7a7163813ae8672
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa0ae,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-14 22:57:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc53.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Marshall Spight" <mspight@dnai.com>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.perl.misc
References: <1004990076967295@aol.com> <3be6fcf8$1@news.sentex.net>
 <ant052344d07fNdQ@oakseed.demon.co.uk> <9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com>
Subject: Re: Best language for low IQ programmers?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <VvCS7.1359$MM5.690717@rwcrnsc53>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 06:57:57 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.127.202.212
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: rwcrnsc53 1008399477 204.127.202.212 (Sat, 15 Dec 2001 06:57:57 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 06:57:57 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.c++:111650
 comp.lang.java.programmer:117740 comp.lang.ada:17946
 comp.lang.perl.misc:82729
Date: 2001-12-15T06:57:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Christian Menke" <C.Menke@t-online.de> wrote in message news:9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> > > I say, wait till someone writes a cross platform compiler
> > > for English. Then you'll have a chance.
> >
> > I'm not so sure. Did you notice his use of English?
> > Hardly a sentence without a spelling error!
> > There's unlikely ever to be a compiler capable
> > of coping with that.
>
> If a human brain can cope with it, it must be possible to write a compiler
> capable of doing it too.

Theoretically possible, yes, but not necessarily practially possible
with today's software and hardware technology.


Marshall