From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,afb4d45672b1e262 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:27:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:27:40 +0100 From: Martin Dowie User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Making money on open source, if not by selling _support_, then how? References: <7NOdne-iYtWmIafZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@megapath.net> <292bf$443bb4e4$45491254$20549@KNOLOGY.NET> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.131.214.62 X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-cg60b/8MhpDo5TADouPwaDd3X8Z2b1wVYB93fep1b7Z0MiRJj+3JnDDNno87EZgkykhbyt9VFllhP1f!6Ij08tg+dI1EQ+/1S7AR5d/RKgBinl86AD142N87AhFQ7wCqmPvtJYpHC6tBUxAPS6F/caBShEg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3802 Date: 2006-04-12T20:27:40+01:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > It's this argument that tars "open source" with the "communist" label (since > that is the only way to decouple means of support from the act of creating > software). And, in any case, it's unrealistic. I don't see any intrinsic > reason that "open source" has to be incompatible with capitalism, but it's > quite important that the creators get some of the rewards. In the current > world, it is the leeches of the world (marketers, lawyers, etc.) that get > most of the money; the creators get little of it. This argument is so true, that I ended up marrying a Chartered Marketer! :-) -- Martin