From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8429314ce5e9d92a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-16 13:21:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!4.24.21.153!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Programming Language Survey Date: 16 May 2003 15:21:46 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1b2f70c3.0305161120.6ca17b7e@posting.google.com> <2wbxa.9575$cK5.1565@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1053116418 7661 192.135.80.34 (16 May 2003 20:20:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37408 Date: 2003-05-16T15:21:46-05:00 List-Id: In article <2wbxa.9575$cK5.1565@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>, "Stephane Richard" writes: > Not sure what the problem could be....I just tried taking the survey and it > worked perfectly fine for me. > > Stephane Richard > > "Larry Kilgallen" wrote in message > news:qKWlbpQmoH9g@eisner.encompasserve.org... >> In article <1b2f70c3.0305161120.6ca17b7e@posting.google.com>, > yxc1856@njit.edu (Yaofei Chen) writes: >> >> > We are doing a survey for Programming Language Trend right now. If you > have >> > interest, please visit http://swlab.njit.edu/techwatch to participate > our >> > survey. >> >> Or perhaps you will find it a waste of time. >> >> I got a lot of visible HTML code and when I plowed through to the end >> and clicked "Submit" it responded with "No answer is submitted.". I certainly cannot make http://validator.w3.org/ accept it.