From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,539c04254abf1b37 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-25 18:34:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!204.71.34.15!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: naval systems Date: 25 Feb 2002 20:34:22 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3C74E519.3F5349C4@baesystems.com> <20020221205157.05542.00000012@mb-cm.news.cs.com> <3C763746.CC8B2965@baesystems.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1014690866 22934 192.135.80.34 (26 Feb 2002 02:34:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20432 Date: 2002-02-25T20:34:22-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Marin David Condic" writes: > Besides, I'd suggest that in real applications that typically involve > hundereds of source files, Ada is likely to *buy* you time over something > like C because it can tell what needs to be recompiled and what doesn't. It > works faster by not working at all. :-) C compilers do this in conjunction with external tools. On VMS the CC command qualifier /MMS_DEPENDENCIES creates (in addition to any output specified by other qualifiers) an MMS description file suitable for describing the conditions under which this file should be compiled again (based on modification dates of included files as well as the mail file). C compilers are likely not so equal to each other as Ada compilers in this regard, but I think that at decision-points regarding ease of use, comparisons will be made between a particular Ada compiler and a particular C compiler, rather than the field in general.