From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-07 11:49:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea.. References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1041968949 12.234.13.56 (Tue, 07 Jan 2003 19:49:09 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 19:49:09 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 19:49:09 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32698 Date: 2003-01-07T19:49:09+00:00 List-Id: > And the same programmers who leak memory or create dangling pointers > with new/delete/malloc/free would do the same thing with > new/unchecked_deallocation. "If there's a 'with Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation' on the body, there ought to be a 'with Ada.Finalization' on the spec."