From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c7b0b777188b7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!fi.sn.net!newsfeed2.fi.sn.net!feeder2.news.jippii.net!feeder1.news.jippii.net!reader1.news.jippii.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Organization: Tidorum Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades References: <1128499462.850353.146890@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87ek6zom2h.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87ek697ga5.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> <435e99ee$0$23939$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1130321538.366226.26460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <4360b346$0$22526$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1130478101.700035.316750@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:20:35 +0300 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.17.205.61 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: reader1.news.jippii.net 1130494965 81.17.205.61 (Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:22:45 EEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:22:45 EEST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6026 Date: 2005-10-28T13:20:35+03:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen wrote: > Steve Whalen wrote: > >> From 1994 to 2004 that meant that small shops that must do > > > proprietary closed source work to survive, but who cannot at > > least initially afford a vendor's support were able to use a > > commercial quality (but not validated) compiler called GNAT. > > I'm curious. Do you actually know of any commercial software > written in Ada? That is, a program written in Ada which is sold > as a non-customized, shrink-wrapped product to multiple customers? > Do any of them show up here in c.l.a? Are they complaining? I am not the original poster, but in part answer to your question, I am writing software in Ada that is meant to be sold mainly as a non-customized product to multiple customers. I did "complain" about GNAT GPL 2005 in the sense that I voted for some other GNAT (that is, a GMGPL GNAT) to be the Debian Ada compiler. But I see that GNAT GPL 2005 has many advantages, perhaps most importantly less work for the Debian Ada team. I am prepared to use some of my own effort and money to have a non-GPL compiler, for example the FSF GNAT. I am also experimenting with the Janus/Ada compiler. The price of the Aonix compiler would be a significant hurdle for me and GNAT Pro is beyond my ceiling at this time. So, that's one data-point for you. As I recall, some of the others who voted for a GMGPL Debian compiler were in the same position. -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ .