From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e48ffa51d71eeec9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Randy Brukardt" Subject: Re: More on the consolidated Ada Reference Manual Date: 2000/11/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 696803564 References: <9ACS5.760$aX.306590@homer.alpha.net> <8vfk4g$tit$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: abuse@alpha.net X-Trace: homer.alpha.net 974924725 156.46.62.124 (Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:25:25 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:25:25 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote in message <8vfk4g$tit$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... >In article <9ACS5.760$aX.306590@homer.alpha.net>, > "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > >> We've added an additional Foreword to this version of the Ada >> Reference Manual which clarifies the status of the document. >> We also took the opportunity to correct 5 small editing errors >> in the previous version. None of the technical content has >> been changed. > >Randy does not make clear here that the "we" he uses here is >the editorial we, meaning Randy! It is not WG9 or any other >official body. To correct Robert's clarification, the "we" I used here refers to the project editors, not just me. (I didn't write the new foreword.) But of course Robert's major point is correct (and is the point of the foreword itself) -- the consolidated ARM is not an official document of WG9 or any other official body. Randy Brukardt