From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,338a248ed46255c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008 References: <7cdbcbe0-5e09-4402-b7a8-a98cf85744b9@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1203718901 12.201.97.213 (Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:21:41 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:21:41 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:21:41 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19999 Date: 2008-02-22T22:21:41+00:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Creem wrote: > > Various Linux kernels have gotten quite a bit better in the last few > years with respect to real-time performance. I would expect a more > typical configuration for the application you suggest would be vxWorks > or LynxOS running on a powerPC running GNAT code. If you open beyond > GNAT to other Ada compilers than things like Greenhills and a few others > would also become possibilities. The OP might also want to consider RTEMS or MaRTE if Linux is not sufficiently real time. http://www.rtems.com/ http://marte.unican.es/ -- Jeff Carter "Help! Help! I'm being repressed!" Monty Python & the Holy Grail 67