From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx04.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "use" after "limited with" (GNAT bug?)
References: <lsitvc$9l8$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <f03ffc27-3d37-4af0-b8c3-9f4bc07cc6ee@googlegroups.com>
 <lsivt6$ecc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In-Reply-To: <lsivt6$ecc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <VQcHv.301333$YC3.294813@fx04.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 00:52:05 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:52:01 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 965
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2450316138
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21775
Date: 2014-08-14T18:52:01-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 14-Aug-14 12:41, Victor Porton wrote:
> Not a language lawyer, but may be it makes sense to introduced "limited use"
> clauses?

How would it work?