From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f948976d12c7ee33 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-23 08:39:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-pas-nf2!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:39:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:40:13 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Boeing and Dreamliner References: <3EF5B10E.40804@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.81 X-Trace: sv3-T3voK+ULSS0bAgMCVA2JYMMgdGScvRo2rnGhkyjniQWRInDWCEWQEO4+tN0AvzUIYFOceYQjm2IhydF!ZIwS/p08FTdfwIOeMfBvS0JcYC5BXY+jMxaJnzIYwdT8M2DvJ4Abk50TxVA0VkvCZ8J5NKJPXedA!mK6i X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39608 Date: 2003-06-23T10:40:13-05:00 List-Id: John R. Strohm wrote: > The real test of an expert is his ability to present information in a way > that a layman can understand it. Sometimes, in a courtroom, what they want a witness to do is confuse the jury. Get them to think, "I don't understand this, but he seems to, so I'll take his word for it." That may violate the principle of reasonable doubt, but it nevertheless happens. Of course, I speak of U.S. courts, which would not be involved in an Ariane 4/5/6 case/ :-)