From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx32.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Your wish list for Ada 202X References: <7f1c01c5-3563-4b94-9831-152dbbf2ecdc@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 04:21:09 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:23:10 -0700 X-Received-Bytes: 1766 X-Received-Body-CRC: 4195798743 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19016 Date: 2014-03-27T22:23:10-07:00 List-Id: On 27-Mar-14 15:06, Randy Brukardt wrote: > #2 looks like lipstick on a pig to me - as you know my thinking on > interfaces. Why couldn't it all be done in such a manner as to avoid MI issues? Something like what we might use signature-packages for ensuring interfaces [functions/procedures] exist for some given type. EX: generic Type Element; Type Implementation; Function Pop (Object : in out Implementation) return Element; Procedure Push (Object : in out Implementation; Item : Element); -- ... package STACK is --.... end STACK; being essentially the same as abstract interface Implementation is private; Function Pop (Object : in out Implementation) return Element; Procedure Push (Object : in out Implementation; Item : Element); -- ... Though perhaps having a parameter of such an abstract-interface would make it prohibitive...