From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dd0ab03054055c44 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-06 22:58:33 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!uunet!intrepid.intrepid.com!usenet From: vladimir@speedy.intrepid.com (Vladimir Vukicevic) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT & Windows NT Date: 07 Feb 1995 06:58:33 GMT Organization: Intrepid Technology, Inc. Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <3h3j4e$9kn@news.cais.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: speedy.intrepid.com In-reply-to: lance@cais.com's message of Sun, 05 Feb 95 22:28:14 GMT Date: 1995-02-07T06:58:33+00:00 List-Id: In article <3h3j4e$9kn@news.cais.com> lance@cais.com (Lance Kibblewhite) writes: > I see that the currently available version of GNAT is intended for > Pentium systems only. > > Is anybody working on a version for 486's? There can't be too many > things within GNAT (or GCC) that would necessitate a Pentium rather > then a 486. pragma Not_Helpful (On); First of all, a few points. 1) Dump Windows 2) Dump Windows 3) Dump Windows 4) Dump Microsoft (along with Windows. and Bob needs to go, too.). Then, get a decent OS, like Linux. or {Net,Free}BSD. or OS/2. (OS/2 is supported by gnat straight out of nyu!) or anything without "Microsoft" in front of it. pragma Not_Helpul (Off); If none of these are possibilites, then I'd say to try using the pentium-only code on your 486. It might work, unless it has a dependancy on using FDIV as a random number generator... :-) If it doesn't find a pentium machine and recompile gcc for 486 instead of pentium. - Vladimir