From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,5da92b52f6784b63 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: Joachim Durchholz Subject: Re: Simulating Eiffel-style assertions (was: Papers on the Ariane-5 crash and Design by Contract) Date: 1997/03/31 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229876933 Sender: Joachim Durchholz References: <5h8uja$p9o@news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de> Organization: ccn - computer consultant network GmbH Reply-To: joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.programming.threads,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > (BTW, calls from within a require, ensure or invariant are completely un- > checked in my implementation - is that what Eiffel compilers do, too?) This is standard - to avoid endless recursion and performance problems . Regards, Joachim