From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,5da92b52f6784b63 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,a48e5b99425d742a X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public From: Joachim Durchholz Subject: Re: Papers on the Ariane-5 crash and Design by Contract Date: 1997/03/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229321697 Sender: Joachim Durchholz References: <01bc3603$f9373d40$b280400a@gavinspc> Organization: ccn - computer consultant network GmbH Reply-To: joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.programming.threads,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-03-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > I am attracted to the idea of catching exception objects based on their > run-time type and I'm sure Eiffel is missing some semantic content here. The class EXCEPTION with several subclasses does exist as part of the standard libraries. Exception handlers can decide what to do based on the run-time class of the exception. This facility does not seem to be in wide-spread use, but it's all there. Regards,