From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <42309456$1@news.broadpark.no> <1110569032.207770@athnrd02> <1110607809.837000@athnrd02> <1110608948.651588@athnrd02> <1110609321.686344@athnrd02> <1110632256.180589@athnrd02> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:26:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.24.208.111 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1110633973 66.24.208.111 (Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:26:13 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:26:13 EST Organization: Road Runner Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9229 comp.lang.c++:45292 comp.realtime:1361 comp.software-eng:4923 Date: 2005-03-12T13:26:13+00:00 List-Id: "Ioannis Vranos" wrote in message news:1110632256.180589@athnrd02... > If you are having for loops with arrays in mind, a simple high level safe > C++ solution exists. Consider: > > > #include > #include > > inline int doubleF(const int &arg) { return 2*arg; } > > // ... > > vectorsomeArray(10, 1); > > // ... > > transform( someArray.begin(), someArray.end(), > someArray.begin(), doubleF ); > > > This can't ever be out of bounds. > Much more just array accesses. Variables of particular units that must stay within range (i.e., lat/long, BAMS, radians, velocities, altitudes, depths, etc.). I'm not saying this can't be done in C++, because I've done it. It's just easier in Ada.