From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <42309456$1@news.broadpark.no> <1110569032.207770@athnrd02> <1110607809.837000@athnrd02> <1110608948.651588@athnrd02> <1110609321.686344@athnrd02> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:16:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.24.208.111 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1110629813 66.24.208.111 (Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:16:53 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:16:53 EST Organization: Road Runner Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9221 comp.lang.c++:45287 comp.realtime:1354 comp.software-eng:4917 Date: 2005-03-12T12:16:53+00:00 List-Id: "Ioannis Vranos" wrote in message news:1110609321.686344@athnrd02... >> Myself thinks though that this whole range specialisation thing is >> non-sense for regular application programming at least. > > > Indeed. :-) > > Not all of us do "regular application programming." I write mission-critical systems. In such an environment, it is non-sense NOT to define ranges for data types that have them. I would rather it "failed loudly" when a variable strayed out of range and raised an exception I can recover from, then continuing to run, causing unknown or undefined behavior.