From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ee1a8b8db84c88f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!newsreader1.level3.com!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada exception block does NOT work? Date: 20 Aug 2005 23:02:46 -0500 Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Message-ID: References: <4301ab29$0$6989$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> In article , Robert A Duff writes: > "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > >> Robert A Duff wrote: >> >> > Ada was certainly not the first language with exceptions. >> > Does anybody know which one was? And were they called "exceptions" >> > and were they "raised" and "handled"? >> >> Perhaps I should have added a smiley in there. > > ;-) > >>... But between Ada and those >> using the C++ notation, Ada was certainly first. > > Indeed. I do prefer "raise/handle" to "throw/catch", but maybe because > that's what I'm used to. > > There are also exceptions in the hardware world, variously called > "exceptions", "traps", and "synchronous interrupts". I'm talking about > divide-by-zero, overflow, and the like. Surely the software concept > came from that? VMS had exception handlers/signal handlers in 1978 with most languages establishing handlers by calls to runtime routines.