From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-11 20:53:41 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!216.166.71.14!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:54:01 -0500
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:53:38 -0500
From: Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why
 it collapsed and died)
References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com>
 <rVzpa.583781$3D1.323774@sccrnsc01>
 <9fa75d42.0304240446.493ca906@posting.google.com> <3EA7E0E3.8020407@crs4.it>
 <9fa75d42.0304240950.45114a39@posting.google.com>
 <4a885870.0304291909.300765f@posting.google.com>
 <416273D61ACF7FEF.82C1D1AC17296926.FF0BFD4934A03813@lp.airnews.net>
 <cf333042.0304300835.4800e03e@posting.google.com>
 <C73FB1279386F1CD.BF0175B06B325A3F.212017A5819C3CBB@lp.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305010621.55e99deb@posting.google.com>
 <0-WcnWfafqsNpiyjXTWcqw@gbronline.com>
 <1051804573.732603@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <vsucnfYa1cNAeSyjXTWcpA@gbronline.com> <3EBE9BD4.1050008@attbi.com>
 <T7yva.16129$rV2.4345@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> <3EBEC762.3030705@attbi.com>
 <TzBva.43$hX1.16@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
In-Reply-To: <TzBva.43$hX1.16@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <UgGdnQpfzepEhyKjXTWcpg@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.71
X-Trace: 
 sv3-YdAMtyGGPHb6UTRLnSt9mt+cnpBE+ekLAc0RmONMFubP2Tyequk2s5PrpQBrhaq93F8mpAgOyFf2OHj!msbNgel7k1PXWRXkBQbX5ObvNS0LwsjNimY/51JKXT/OPJ93ufW/T/j8ksDeIJN+PAKpare0rklv!S8ea
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37217
Date: 2003-05-11T22:53:38-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> would not be caught by Ada language facilities. An impression I often
> get from Ada proponents is that the errors that Ada catches are the
> (only) ones that matter.

Oh, bull.  Numerous people in c.l.a. have often said
that one can write bad code in any language.  Our
irritation with a certain large subset of C programmers
is their insistence that "any decent programmer" can
avoid the errors Ada prevents--while they continue
to fail to avoid those errors.