From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e29322ee367c19d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Mike Silva" Subject: Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem? Date: 2000/01/13 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572326915 References: <387E574A.146BD794@home.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: news@wenet.net X-Trace: news.wenet.net 947806324 206.169.137.33 (Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:32:04 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:32:04 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Mike Silva wrote in message ... Disregard the nonsense I just wrote -- I guess I wasn't paying close attention to what I was responding to. My *new* response is that such a translation array just seems like an extra layer, but maybe it is a better solution than UC. Mike >This seems "busy", but my biggest objection would be having to enter the >same data twice (and keeping both sets consistent) -- isn't that always a >rich source of errors? > >Mike > > >