From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a46843ba8cee64d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-20 00:39:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: dinamic object reclamation
Date: 20 Sep 2001 02:39:31 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <UbWBgGMm2f6B@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <9oa69d$6ej$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
 <mailman.1000953930.8995.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1000971578 23895 192.135.80.34 (20 Sep 2001
 07:39:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:39:38 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13200
Date: 2001-09-20T02:39:31-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have been keeping my mouth shut and ignoring this thread,
figuring I did not know enough computer science to understand
that strange term "dinamic".

Now I get it :-)