From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5e0cbbafd9d00923,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-12 10:58:05 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!proxad.net!feeder2.proxad.net!nnrp2.proxad.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Etienne Baudin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION and others stories X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:56:52 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.252.179.200 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp2.proxad.net 984423412 193.252.179.200 (Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:56:52 CET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:56:52 CET Organization: Guest of ProXad - France Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5651 Date: 2001-03-12T18:56:52+00:00 List-Id: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Appears when I compile with <> with <> there isn't problem else : is "tab(1..3):=anothertab(1..3)" faster than tab(1):=anothertab(1) tab(2):=anothertab(2) tab(3):=anothertab(3) or is it the same execution time ? Then, does anyone know this compilar message and could tell me what is wrong ? <> Thanks Etienne Baudin