From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e66fe8b30e3ee2c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: S'Write and How To Count Bytes
Date: 2000/10/06
Message-ID: <UFsD5.617$qR3.295744@homer.alpha.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 678473794
References: 
 <39D6891A.7DC448B6@acm.org><hXTB5.64979$Ao1.5807473@newsrump.sjc.telocity.net><39D88ACE.92DF8897@acm.org>
 <8raa11$nmg$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <wccpuligl02.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500
X-Complaints-To: abuse@alpha.net
X-Trace: homer.alpha.net 970872564 156.46.62.124 (Fri,
 06 Oct 2000 17:49:24 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 17:49:24 CDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-10-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert A Duff wrote in message ...
>Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:
>
>> I'm not sure if implementors are required to make 'Write on unbounded
>> strings (or bounded ones for that matter) do anything sensible. I
don't
>> see anything in the LRM about it, so I'd guess not.
>
>I think there's an AI on this.

Indeed, it is in the Technical Corrigendum. See 13.13.2(36.1/1) in the
revised ARM.

            Randy.

(Wondering about that paragraph number? The ".1" means it is the first
inserted paragraph after paragraph 36; the "/1" means that it is from
revision 1 [i.e. Technical Corrigendum 1])