From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:55:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:56:18 -0700 From: glen herrmannsfeldt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <5rSdnTfTP7NHEyzZnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@comcast.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.18.174.4 X-Trace: sv3-pGi/Xc24Yy2qXBvO6h9GtQBe4Bt+d0p0Zg+DxPbRFxd2qs0Xxs95LUQSCaT3i0ijji2DawIB8YArDY9!tsMiV/zJV8HMMvkHs5umipw3CBdt1N1oNViixh1cu/bW+Gp8zJmd3u1LVXiQGQAqUgT9sstMp2AH!YDqnIQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5603 comp.lang.fortran:11922 comp.lang.pl1:1973 Date: 2006-07-10T22:56:18-07:00 List-Id: robin wrote: > glen herrmannsfeldt wrote in message <5rSdnTfTP7NHEyzZnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@comcast.com>... >>For signed integer types, most, if not all, allow twos complement, >>ones complement, or sign magnitude representation. > Virtually all use twos complement for negative values. > Few ever used ones complement anyway. They were a PITA. CDC used ones complement, and as I understand it Univac still does. The last sign magnitude binary machine I know of is the 7090. S/360 and successors use sign magnitude for fixed point decimal arithmetic. I don't know of any nines complement machines, but there probably were some along the way. -- glen